Saturday, May 2, 2015
Saturday, April 4, 2015
Friday, January 2, 2015
Friday, August 8, 2014
"8. The City Clerk: The City Clerk, or duly authorized representative, shall attend all business meetings of the City Council and maintain a permanent journal of its proceedings. All votes shall be recorded by calling the names of each member on a positional rotation basis with Council President’s vote called last." (Pg 10).
"3. Public Recognition: Any member of the public shall have the right to address the Council and the Mayor on issues not on the Agenda. No member of the public shall engage in discussion or comment which a) is obscene, indecent or libelous; b) promotes the sale of products, or services; c) promotes any lottery or contest which offers prizes dependent in whole or in part upon lot or chance. It is suggested that questions from the public posed to the Council that cannot be answered at the Council meeting should be put in writing in order to receive a written response from the appropriate party or parties within a reasonable time. Letters addressed to City officials will not be read in Public Recognition unless an exception is granted by Council President based upon exceptional circumstances. Argumentative Rebuttal is not permitted during Public Recognition." (Pg 10).
"2. Courtesy: All speakers, including Council members, during comments, discussion or debate of any issue, shall address their comments to the Council President with courtesy and proper deportment. Comments shall not contain personalities, derogatory remarks or insinuations toward any member of the Council, Staff and Public, but shall be confined to facts that are germane and relevant to the issue." (Pg 8).
Stick with me here, because the last part is very important. This is a legislative body having a meeting with public interaction under Robert's Rules of Order. Nowhere, does it state that a city employee has discretionary powers to address the public, or to regulate their behavior.
Paragraph 8 is rather explicit in the duties of the clerk. She is to sit in attendance and record.
Paragraph 3 states the manner and language the public will utilize when addressing the council, or mayor. The public has the same standard of conduct, just as the clerk, because they are attending a meeting. There is to be no argumentative conduct, or the use of indecent language.
Finally, there is an explicit paragraph which stresses courtesy to all persons present, with no derogatory remarks.
I conclude that the city clerk has engaged in derogatory conduct, using indecent language, and her actions are clear example of remarks that are not permitted in each article presented. She uses offensive and derogatory language, and did not display the required courtesy.
Thursday, July 3, 2014
Monday, June 16, 2014
Update: I have one comment from an associate of Mike Strube, his real estate buddy. I'll respond by stating my comments were involved with getting a new police chief for Bremerton (Pajama Girl), the ousting of several office holders (intoxication, apathy, and not showing up for the job). I've got a track record on the financial irregularities in the SK schools, school crosswalks in Bremerton, along with disability access and sanitary conditions in the Bremerton city parking lots. Long term readers know that I got my start back in 2009 on the failed iniative tax levy for the homeless, after Josh Brown bankrupted the Veteran's Fund, by diverting the money for employee (supervisor) COLA raises. Notice that Josh has resigned.
My point in this post, is that rather than doing the business of advocacy for Bremerton Chamber of Commerce Members, Mike Strube is an anonymous hatchet job going after government critics. He does so with the blessing of the administrator's of the Kitsap Sun. Here's a public government advocate acting in the same manner, as private anonymous critics, just to antagonize and marginalize them. Certainly, he does not address the criticism of government. He responds with more of the same, Straw Man arguments, and Ad Hominem attacks.